2 reasons why the AEW Casino Ladder match is better than WWE Money In The Bank and 3 why MITB is better

#2 Why the AEW Casino Ladder Match is better: May end even before the final participant enters the match

The AEW Casino Ladder Match does not provide uniformity to its competitors, and it is both an advantage and a disadvantage.

The commentators often notify the audience that the match may end even before all competitors enter the ring. This providing earlier entrants with an unfair advantage to counteract their tiredness while the later entrants enter the fray.

However, the two Casino Ladder matches in AEW history have ended after the entries of all competitors. Hangman Page, the joker, won the latest match, but what if the joker of the next match does not get a chance to enter at all?

---

#2 Why WWE Money In The Bank is better: Winners can choose their opponent

Most of WWE Money In The Bank's existence has seen the company divide its roster into two or three brands, each with its world champion. In between the two brand splits, WWE primarily maintained two world championships until their unification in 2013, and separate matches were held for a chance at each championship.

Thus, holders of the briefcase have invariably had the opportunity to select their opponents amongst multiple world champions on the roster. This often leads to surprise and intrigue.

Big E, for example, hounded Paul Heyman for weeks before eventually cashing in on WWE Champion Bobby Lashley, creating a genuinely surprising moment.