Because there is no shame in admitting that I'm a fan of Magnus Carlsen

Why Magnus Carlsen is so special

• • Because there is no shame in admitting that I’m a fan of Magnus Carlsen. Outrageous young talent has this tendency to ‘normalise’!
  • Because the way he plays the game: Uncompromising! When asked why he didn’t offer a draw to Anand in the 10th game of the World championship match which could have sealed his title, he told his father and manager: “I’m a chess player. I’m supposed to PLAY chess!”
  • Because there can’t be a more powerful slap than the above quote for those who play agreed, spineless, fightless, disgraceful draws at the top level. Agreed draws is the biggest threat to the game of chess after lack of corporate sponsorship.
  • Because the distribution of seven draws in the Anand-Carlsen match was thus: two with three-fold repetition, two dead draws; two insufficient material, one agreed draw. It came as an oasis after last year’s Anand-Gelfand match.
  • Because he has openly said that opening preparation is a bit over-rated.
  • Because in his hands black or white pieces aim to attain the same terrain: equality (opening), quality (middlegame), superiority (endgame).
  • Because he has proved that majority of players agree for half-baked draws because they are mutually not confident about their endgame skills!
  • Because he is a pathbreaker. He can bypass opening preparation of the best opposition. And that may suggest that his understanding of openings is better than those who ‘scholarise’ it.
  • Because he calculates better than the computer in endgame.
  • Because he gives hope to all those by proving that one can excel in chess with smart work, not necessarily hard work which kills creativity, confidence and ability to fight till the end.
  • Because being an outgoing, sporty and fun person, he is the best brand ambassador for the game if you want to attract youth to the sport.
  • Because he plays on equal, or slightly minus positions, as if nothing has happened. When others psychologically suffer due to lack of initiative on the board, he maintains his composure and plays with confidence.
  • Because he is the “most undisputed” world champion since Garry Kasparov. Of course, Kramnik and Anand proved their credentials beyond doubt. But they got a shot at the matchplay titles in dubious circumstances. Kramnik didn’t prove before his 2000 match against Kasparov that he was a worthy challenger. And when Anand became the challenger through Mexico win in 2007, Topalov was not eligible to play that tournament.
  • Because he is undisputed world No. 1 and won a right to challenge Anand though a proper candidates tournament. It’s a poetic justice that one win there counted for more than Kramnik’s two draws.
  • Because he defeated Anand 3-0. Not via tie-breaks or not with +1 score. He showed his strength and deep understanding of the game on the highest stage.
  • Because Anand responded to a somewhat irritating question after losing his title (would he have chosen a better challenger to his throne than Carlsen?): “I didn’t choose him.” Well, Anand is spot on. Magnus was chosen by the bigger force.