Can the mystery spinners find their mojo again in international cricket?

The possible reasons for their decline

One of the major reasons for their decline has been the over-exposure of their mystery. While most spinners can spin the ball both ways in ways that defy physics, the more orthodox bowlers have prolonged careers and can sustain their efficacy for a long time, while mystery men fade into oblivion almost as soon as they arrive.

Why? Because mystery spinners depend solely on spinning the ball both ways to confound the batsmen, while the orthodox spinners’ chief way of victimizing batsmen is through flight, drift, variation of pace and turn. The very ability to befuddle batsmen with spin in either direction itself turns out to be their nemesis.

Sonny Ramadhin, Ajantha Mendis and Jack Iverson all made headlines with their uncanny ability to run through a line up. Batsmen would sweat it out day and night to pick their variations, and the discovery of a way to handle them would ultimately spell their end.

Mystery spin, much like an overdose of antibiotics, quickly makes the adversary immune to it.

The other important factor is the inability of most mystery spinners to adopt the nuances of orthodox spin bowling. A good spinner with an element of mystery about him should still be able to be effective even if batsmen adopt a strategy to read the direction of his spin. But all mystery spinners vanished as soon as the batters could read which way the ball would spin.

The only possible reason for this observation is that the mystery spinners relied solely on their ability to dart the ball both ways. Once that is compromised, their life is lost.

When Ajantha Mendis shot to fame, he was thought to be an off spinner. Hence, batsmen were bamboozled by his carrom balls that went the other way. His first year in cricket was thus very successful, but the batsmen finally understood that he was a very different kind of spinner.

When they found a way to read his carrom balls, googlies and off breaks, his career was almost over. His inability to turn the ball big, drift the ball and change his pace to good effect proved to be his undoing.

Their incapability to re-invent themselves is another reason for their demise. When batsmen blocked their only way of picking up wickets, they could not emerge with a different option. Good players should always be able to circumvent challenges. But mystery spinners could not stand up to the challenge when it really mattered.

Can they rediscover their mojo?

Ashwin is the best current example of how to add mystery to spin bowling

The answer is a clear yes. And for an explanation to that answer, you need to look no further than Ravichandran Ashwin.

Ashwin is a quintessential spinner for most mystery spinners. The lanky Indian, despite being a very good off-spinner, initially made headlines for his carrom balls. With the overdose of T20s, Ashwin almost became a mystery man, often bowling his carrom balls every other ball. At one stage he stopped trying to spin, flight or drift the ball.

But towards the latter part of 2014, he rediscovered himself. The World Cup saw him vary his pace, flight the ball and spin it. He wanted to out-do the batsmen in the air instead of off the pitch. All of a sudden, an above-average-bowler became an unplayable nightmare.

His off breaks curled like a snake in the air and leapt like a frog off the pitch, so much so that Kumar Sangakkara, the best batsmen of the modern era, got out four times in a row to him. Batsmen knew what was coming at them but they still had no answer.

So much for mystery! While Ashwin still bowls his carrom balls, he seems to have clearly understood the fact that his primary weapon is his stock delivery.

Mystery spinners should all adopt a stock ball. It can be any ball, but they should bowl their variations around it. Bowling six different balls an over might initially bring success, but as history indicates, with time that would be their bête noir.

Variations are good only as long as they are used as variations. The moment variations rival the stock balls, the bowler should start counting his days.

“Playing in the mind” is a term that most good spinners love to use. Saeed Ajmal’s off breaks spun big. When he made his debut in 2009, he rattled the Lankans. But curse the ad nauseam of T20s, his doosras upstaged his off breaks as he somehow forgot the art of defeating the batsmen in the air. He was flat during the latter part of his career as he started losing his effectiveness before being banned for chucking.

Ashwin and Ajmal are two good examples for future spinners who want to have a touch of mystery about them. Ashwin – the example of how to be, and Ajmal – the example of how not to become. Mystery is a luxury. But the ability to bowl like an orthodox spinner is a necessity.

Mystery spinners can still keep the batsmen guessing, if and only if they can start bowling like normal spinners. Spinning the ball both ways is not a crime. But doing so without incorporating variations in pace, line and length is a recipe for disaster.

A mystery is like a firecracker which flickers bright before fading out. Orthodox spin is like a candle that exudes dull light but lasts longer. Breaking the rules is important but mastering them in advance is more important.

In this world of austere crackdown on illegal actions and high-speed cameras, mystery spinners can survive. But they would need more than just plain mystery to do that.