What is Sachin Tendulkar's true greatness?

4) “Tendulkar has a mediocre series-defining record in Tests”

Mohammad Azharuddin, Dravid and Laxman are all better big match/series players than Tendulkar in Tests. The index says that the series-defining record does not necessarily take Test wins into consideration.

Even the most die-hard of Tendulkar fans would grudgingly have to agree that Dravid and Laxman, in the 2000s, delivered performances that impacted India’s fortunes in a Test series more often than Tendulkar.

Amongst his peers, he ranks fourth behind Dravid, Inzamam-ul-Haq and Kumara Sangakkara in terms of number of series-defining performances in Tests, but the career impact of his series-defining performances is reduced due to the sheer weight of matches he’s played.

The most startling stat in this department from Impact Index is where they state:

“Even more curiously, 4 of his 6 SDs (series-defining) in Tests came as a support act – when someone either took the lead or scored more than him (Leeds 2002, Chennai 2008, Colombo 2010 and Mohali 2010). Tendulkar was a consistent and significant support act for most of his career in matches that really mattered to his team from a series-defining angle (except for the 2008-2011 phase mentioned above). But he was not the leading man and no, it was not because of the bowlers. In most of the iconic Test series wins/draws for Indian cricket in the last 15 years – Australia 2001, England 2002, Australia 2003/4, Pakistan 2004, West Indies 2006, England 2007, Tendulkar played an effective support role with the bat while other batsmen took the lead.”

Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar during a partnership

At Leeds 2002, Dravid’s 148 set the tone for India, and he shared a 150-run partnership with Tendulkar for the third wicket. It’s a little harsh to say that Dravid took the lead here, because he did come one position ahead of Tendulkar. And Tendulkar did go on to have two crucial partnerships, one with Dravid and the other with Ganguly who also cracked a century.

A similar thread prevails in Chennai 2008, where chasing 387 for victory, Tendulkar made an unbeaten 103 to take the team home, after a solid start provided by Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir, especially Sehwag whose superb strike rate made it possible for India to go for the win.

Tendulkar had the highest score (203) in the series in Sri Lanka in 2010, but it was Sehwag who dictated the outcome with his superb batting and was rightly named the Man of the Series.

And in Mohali, Tendulkar’s 98 was a crucial innings in the scheme of things and though Laxman brought it home with the number 11 in a nail-biter, Tendulkar’s innings helped India attain the first innings lead. He also hit a wonderful 203 in the next Test in Bangalore.

5) “Tendulkar was not good under the weight of expectation”

The index states that the batting maestro faltered under the weight of expectation, pointing to his failures in the knockout stages of World Cups where his performances dipped in comparison to earlier phases.

In the 2011 World Cup, after two centuries in the group stages, he went cheaply in the final, made a scratchy half-century in the semis against Pakistan which featured no less than four let-offs, and in the quarters against Australia, had a half-century.

He has two brilliant finals performances against the Aussies though, which is covered by the article, adding that both came in his two prosperous phases. This included the ‘Desert Storm’ innings in Sharjah and the tri-series final in Sydney and Brisbane in 2008.

The other major dig the article takes is at his skills at finishing a game, under pressure.

“Tendulkar is also the only one of the “great” modern-day batsman in the world who has as many cases of not finishing a job once set as he does – the most famous examples being 136 vs Pakistan (Chennai, 1999) in Tests and 175 vs Australia (Hyderabad, 2009) in ODIs.”

The innings against Bangladesh where he apparently compromised the team’s progress with an eye on the landmark is another of those moments that comes to mind.

It can be said that while Tendulkar proved to be the engine for many of his team’s successes early in a tournament, he has perhaps not contributed so tellingly at the latter stages.

6) “Tendulkar was a technically perfect batsman with no palpable weaknesses”

“He scored against all opponents, in all conditions. He is the highest impact Indian batsman in South Africa – arguably the toughest country for Test batsmen and one of the highest impact batsmen against Australia – who, for a good part of his career, had the best bowling line-up in the world.”

Sachin Tendulkar of India looks on with a bust of Sir Donald Bradman before his last match at the SCG before the One Day International match between Australia and India at Sydney Cricket Ground on February 26, 2012 in Sydney, Australia

There isn’t much to debate here really as it is something of a universal acknowledgement. Other Indian and international batsmen with slightly inferior techniques and poise may have overshadowed him in the impact rankings, but Tendulkar’s completeness is the stuff of legend.

7) “Tendulkar batted in the most productive positions in cricket history.”

A very interesting fact and a very brusquely true one at that; Tendulkar has batted at No. 4 in Tests and No. 2 in ODIs for most of his career.

The openers and the No. 3 batsman see off the new ball in Tests, while in ODIs the field is up and the powerplays are in effect for the openers to take advantage of. Especially in ODIs, the openers have the best chance of racking up the highest scores.

The article goes on to state that he was quite obstinate about both positions for most of his career, a fact not entirely irrefutable.

“In the context of Tests, it is curious that he volunteered to open only once in his career despite perhaps being the most equipped of all batsmen of his generation to do so.

“Meanwhile, a plethora of hapless top/middle-order batsmen had their careers jeopardised by being forced to open including Yuvraj, Dravid, Sehwag and even Laxman (India was lucky that Sehwag made such a great fist of it).”

So while Tendulkar had a fabulous record in the positions that he played at, especially in Tests, the contribution of the trio that came before him, cannot be undermined.

8) “Tendulkar is the poorest Indian captain in 30 years”

Just like the few glowing ones, this negative aspect, also does need stats to support the argument. Impact Index shows that Tendulkar’s record as captain is amongst the worst out of all those who captained India in the last 30 years.

He won 4, lost 9 and drew 12 in Tests and in ODIs won 23 and lost 43. That record brings him the lowest captaincy impact amongst all those captained India in the last 30 years (part-timers excluded). And in the IPL and the CLT20, the Mumbai Indians performed best when Tendulkar was not the captain.

This can again be linked to his inability to cope with certain high-pressure situations.

9) “Tendulkar put himself ahead of his team whenever the two interests clashed.”

The final argument from Impact Index’s article, and perhaps the most controversial, is the debate on whether Sachin Tendulkar played for personal milestones or for the team.

The article says that “during the course of establishing some personal statistical landmark, the team’s interests were compromised by Tendulkar, sometimes flagrantly so” on many occasions.

Tendulkar celebrates a century

Examples of this cited are the Sydney Test in 2004 where he took his time to overhaul Dravid’s then highest score for an Indian overseas of 233, saying that the extra time taken cost India a crucial match and historic series win.

They also say that Dravid’s declaration in the next Test at Multan with Tendulkar on 194 was in fact borne out of frustration at Tendulkar not responding to repeated reminders to speed up.

The Sydney Test in 2008 is also cited for his reported attempt to stay not out as he chose to give the number 11 the strike after just the first or second ball. At that stage, India were 38 ahead and Tendulkar already had 145.

Gautam Gambhir was also guilty of the same infraction in 2012 against England, but the Delhi batsman was publicly slated by skipper MS Dhoni for doing just that. Oddly enough, Gambhir hasn’t played a single series since. Tendulkar though has not been tackled in such a manner by any Indian captain.

And there is the hundredth hundred against Bangladesh, which cannot be in any way disputed, as it definitely did slow down the pace of an Indian innings that was in overdrive until then.

Verdict

The article quoted above has some eyebrow-raising arguments on the career of Sachin Tendulkar. Some of them are obvious, some others not so much, while a few are quite hard-hitting.

All said and done, readers can come to their own conclusions on Tendulkar, his records and his peers.

What do you make of it all? Leave your comments below.