Recently, there has been a debate in the cricketing circles to eliminate the toss from test cricket. Some proponents of the theory suggest that rather than spinning the coin the guest team should be given the choice whether to bat first or bowl. They say in this way the advantage of the home side while preparing the pitch shall lessen.
In the previous Bangalore test between South Africa and India, Virat Kohli after winning the toss opted to field first. It was after 41 years that a captain winning the toss at Bangalore has decided not to bat first.
During the Delhi test, it was found out that no team has ever opted to bat second after winning the toss at the Feroz Shah Kotla stadium Delhi. It is indeed an apparent rarity that despite hosting 33 Test matches Delhi stadium has not seen a team that batted second after winning the toss.
So, we decided to dig some numbers to find out how many teams actually are afraid of batting second and are more keen to put on some runs on the scorecard for the other team to chase them eventually in the fourth innings of a test.
It is no hidden fact that chasing a total in the fourth inning is indeed a very difficult task. But the numbers we came across suggest that the international cricketers are equally, if not more, eager to bat first after winning the toss when compared to the street boys.
We also went some steps further to find out which stadiums and countries have the highest win toss-bat first percentage. The research came up with some interesting points. Let us first see how batting first tendencies are across different formats of international cricket.
Tests have the highest percentage (by a margin of 20 percent) of teams batting first after winning the toss while in limited overs format the decision is almost fifty-fifty with balance slightly tilting in favour of batting first.
W/L Ratio for teams winning the toss and batting first is above 1 for Tests, T20Is and also overall matches, but lower than 1 for ODIs.
Format | Matches Played | Toss Won- Batted First | Percentage | Won | Lost | Tie | Drawn/NR | W/L Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All International Matches | 6376 | 3763 | 59.02 | 1584 | 1553 | 26 | 599 | 1.019 |
Tests | 2191 | 1597 | 72.89 | 555 | 496 | 2 | 543 | 1.118 |
ODIs | 3712 | 1916 | 51.62 | 901 | 941 | 19 | 55 | 0.957 |
T20Is | 473 | 250 | 52.85 | 128 | 116 | 5 | 1 | 1.103 |
Now we will focus only on Test Matches.
Win-Toss Bat First Team by Team Comparison (Tests)
When we ran our fingers across the record books, we found out that England is the team most likely to bat first after winning the toss. At an overwhelming 80+ percentage, England has batted first 4 times out 5 when they won the toss, and fielded first only once.
Australia and India have a percentage of 80 and 77 respectively and are on number 2 and 3.
Excluding Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, New Zealand is the least successful team after winning the toss and batting first with a win-loss ratio of just 0.355 in such matches.
Among top 8 Nations, 6 have a win-loss ratio in excess of 1 when playing first after winning the toss – which means they win the test game more often than not when batting first after winning the toss.
Only West Indies and New Zealand (among top 8 nations) have a W/L ratio lower than 1.
The percentage has not dropped below 60 for any team. New Zealand has the lowest percentage at 60.59.
The table is presented below for further analysis.
Team | Matches Played | Won Toss | Won Toss- Batted First | Percentage Batting First | Won | Lost | Tied | Drawn | W/L Ratio | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
England | 965 | 465 |
| 80.43 | 143 | 90 | 0 | 141 | 1.588 | |
Australia | 783 | 397 | 317 | 79.85 | 156 | 81 | 1 | 79 | 1.925 | |
India | 495 | 250 | 193 | 77.20 | 56 | 51 | 0 | 85 | 1.098 | |
South Africa | 396 | 189 | 144 | 76.19 | 53 | 51 | 0 | 40 | 1.039 | |
Pakistan | 395 | 188 | 127 | 67.55 | 35 | 32 | 0 | 60 | 1.093 | |
Zimbabwe | 97 | 56 | 37 | 66.07 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 0.12 | |
West Indies | 510 | 262 | 170 | 64.89 | 55 | 61 | 1 | 53 | 0.901 | |
Bangladesh | 93 | 48 | 30 | 62.50 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 5 | 0.19 | |
Sri Lanka | 243 | 133 | 82 | 61.65 | 29 | 25 | 0 | 28 | 1.16 | |
New Zealand | 404 | 203 | 123 | 60.59 | 21 | 59 | 0 | 43 | 0.355 |
Percentage of Batting First After Winning Toss- Comparison by Host Country
The purpose of this part is to find out which host countries are most likely to see a team batting first after winning the toss. In other words, teams playing in which parts of the world are afraid of ultimately chasing down a target.
India hosted 248 tests, and only in 20 of those, it saw a team batting second after winning the toss. So, an incredibly high percentage of 91 is carried by Indian grounds when it comes to batting first after winning the toss.
Among top 8 nations, 5 hosting countries have a win/ loss ratio in excess of 1. So, a team winning the toss and batting first is more likely to win the game here than the team batting second.
Pakistan, West Indies and New Zealand have a lower win/loss ratio among top 8 nations for a team batting first after winning the toss.
New Zealand is again at the bottom of the table when it comes to percentage. It is the only host country where a toss-winning captain has decided to field first or more occasions than not.
Host Country | Matches Played | Won Toss- Batted First | Percentage | Won | Lost | Tied | Drawn | W/L Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India | 248 | 228 | 91.94 | 68 | 61 | 1 | 97 | 1.114 |
U.A.E. | 25 | 20 | 80.00 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 1.285 |
England | 499 | 397 | 79.56 | 148 | 110 | 0 | 139 | 1.345 |
Pakistan | 151 | 112 | 74.17 | 20 | 32 | 0 | 60 | 0.625 |
Bangladesh | 52 | 38 | 73.08 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 10 | 0.647 |
Australia | 401 | 290 | 72.32 | 132 | 102 | 1 | 55 | 1.294 |
South Africa | 211 | 150 | 71.09 | 61 | 52 | 0 | 37 | 1.173 |
Sri Lanka | 126 | 89 | 70.63 | 35 | 28 | 0 | 26 | 1.25 |
West Indies | 233 | 149 | 63.95 | 40 | 45 | 0 | 64 | 0.888 |
Zimbabwe | 52 | 31 | 59.62 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 0.75 |
New Zealand | 193 | 93 | 48.19 | 22 | 30 | 0 | 41 | 0.733 |
Percentage of Batting First After Winning Toss- Comparison by Host Country (Tests)
We selected as many as 53 grounds from around the world, and this is what we came across.
4- Number of stadiums with a percentage of won toss-batting first is exact 100. Interestingly, all four stadiums are on Indian soil.
4- Number of Stadiums to have a percentage lower than 50 – 2 out of them are from New Zealand.
7- 7 stadiums with the highest percentage are in India.
49- Out of selected 53 stadiums, 49 of them have a percentage higher than 50 – meaning thereby that winning the toss implies batting first on occasions more than fielding first events.
34- Number of stadiums that have a W/L ratio equal to or more than 1. 19 stadiums, on the other hand, have a W/L ratio lower than 1.
4- Out of the bottom 7 grounds – grounds with lowest won toss-bat first percentage belong to New Zealand.
Ground | Played | Won Toss-Batted First | Percentage | Won | Lost | Tied | Drawn | W/L Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feroz Shah Kotla, Delhi | 33 | 33 | 100.00 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 0.384 |
Brabourne Stadium, Mumbai | 18 | 18 | 100.00 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 0.4 |
Nehru Stadium, Madras | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Vidarbha C.A. Ground, Nagpur | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | 31 | 30 | 96.77 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 | 1.111 |
Green Park, Kanpur | 21 | 20 | 95.24 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 2 |
Sardar Patel Stadium, Ahmedabad | 12 | 11 | 91.67 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1.5 |
Old Wanderers, Johannesburg | 22 | 20 | 90.91 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 1.166 |
M.Chinnaswamy Stadium, Bangalore | 21 | 19 | 90.48 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1.2 |
P Sara Oval, Colombo | 20 | 18 | 90.00 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
Old Trafford, Manchester | 76 | 68 | 89.47 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 28 | 1.857 |
Adelaide Oval | 74 | 66 | 89.19 | 29 | 19 | 0 | 18 | 1.526 |
Dubai Cricket Stadium | 9 | 8 | 88.89 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Sharjah Cricket Ground | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Eden Gardens, Kolkata | 39 | 34 | 87.18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 1.25 |
Kennington Oval, London | 98 | 85 | 86.73 | 30 | 24 | 0 | 31 | 1.25 |
Bourda, Georgetown, Guyana | 30 | 26 | 86.67 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 0.714 |
Trent Bridge, Nottingham | 61 | 51 | 83.61 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 20 | 1.583 |
The Wanderers, Johannesburg | 35 | 29 | 82.86 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 2.142 |
Newlands, Cape Town | 52 | 43 | 82.69 | 17 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 0.894 |
Galle International Stadium | 27 | 22 | 81.48 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2.4 |
National Stadium, Karachi | 41 | 33 | 80.49 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 17 | 0.333 |
Iqbal Stadium, Faisalabad | 24 | 19 | 79.17 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 2.5 |
Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai | 24 | 19 | 79.17 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1.8 |
Sydney Cricket Ground | 103 | 81 | 78.64 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 13 | 1 |
Zahur Ahmed Stadium, Chittagong | 14 | 11 | 78.57 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Headingley, Leeds | 74 | 58 | 78.38 | 23 | 22 | 0 | 13 | 1.045 |
Sabina Park, Kingston, Jamaica | 48 | 37 | 77.08 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 11 | 0.857 |
Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | 19 | 14 | 73.68 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0.285 |
Melbourne Cricket Ground | 107 | 77 | 71.96 | 39 | 28 | 0 | 10 | 1.392 |
Lord's, London | 131 | 93 | 70.99 | 34 | 24 | 0 | 35 | 1.416 |
Edgbaston, Birmingham | 48 | 34 | 70.83 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 0.769 |
Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | 40 | 28 | 70.00 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 14 | 0.272 |
McLean Park, Napier | 10 | 7 | 70.00 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | - |
Asgiriya Stadium, Kandy | 21 | 14 | 66.67 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1.5 |
Punjab C.A. Stadium, Mohali | 12 | 8 | 66.67 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Kingsmead, Durban | 40 | 26 | 65.00 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 1.428 |
Shere Bangla Stadium, Dhaka | 14 | 9 | 64.29 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0.75 |
SSC, Colombo | 39 | 25 | 64.10 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0.727 |
Bellerive Oval, Hobart | 11 | 7 | 63.64 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Queen's Park Oval, Trinidad | 59 | 37 | 62.71 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 14 | 1.09 |
Brisbane Cricket Ground | 58 | 35 | 60.34 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 1.5 |
Bangabandhu National Stadium, Dhaka | 19 | 11 | 57.89 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0.25 |
St George's Park, Port Elizabeth | 26 | 15 | 57.69 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0.857 |
Antigua Recreation Ground, Antigua | 22 | 12 | 54.55 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 0.666 |
W.A.C.A. Ground, Perth | 42 | 22 | 52.38 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0.8 |
Eden Park, Auckland | 49 | 25 | 51.02 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 1.166 |
Basin Reserve, Wellington | 57 | 29 | 50.88 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 0.357 |
Harare Sports Club | 32 | 16 | 50.00 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1.4 |
AMI Stadium, Christchurch | 40 | 19 | 47.50 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 0.833 |
Kensington Oval, Bridgetown, Barbados | 51 | 24 | 47.06 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0.5 |
Super Sports, Centurion | 20 | 6 | 30.00 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3.00 |
Seddon Park, Hamilton | 20 | 6 | 30.00 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.500 |
Follow IPL Auction 2025 Live Updates, News & Biddings at Sportskeeda. Get the fastest updates on Mega-Auction and cricket news