Virat Kohli vs Hashim Amla: Comparing the two ODI run machines

Hashim Amla

Amla, however, pales in comparison when it comes to possessing landmark records. This, however, is only one small part of a much larger picture.

His batting possesses virtually none of the atrocious shot-making many of the other modern day batsmen employ, hence none of the mini-orgasmic fan cries of oohs that define Gayle or his compatriot de Villiers. He probably belongs to the old school of batting wherein anything unconventional was a sacrilege. He goes about his job nonchalantly and without much fuss.

Hence, his prominence in Test matches, but what about ODIs?

His domination in the 50-over format is news for many. Amla had to make his mark in Test cricket before being considered for ODIs, much the opposite when compared to Kohli. Logically, the transition should have been difficult, or at least should have taken time before he made it big. Sadly for opponents, probability has its own limitations.

For a batsman who had been touted as a test specialist, an average of around 55, much better than Kohli’s, underlines his indispensability in the one-day format.

Plus there is also his strike rate of 91 runs per 100 balls faced, exceptional for someone looked upon as fitting something like the Dravid-mould. Stoical as he may seem, his batting exploits belie a character who is all for calculated aggression. It is almost romantic how cricket throws up these incongruities that makes people fall in love with the game all over again.

There has been much hue and cry about Kohli getting to 4000 runs second fastest, but few might have noticed Amla creeping up the runs-ladder, now set to overtake Kohli at least in this regard.

It might come as a revelation to many, but Amla has 11 ODI tons in 73 innings, which is remarkable and looks a notch better than Kohli’s 15 in 108 innings. Agreed, two tons against Zimbabwe and one against the Dutch take some of the sheen away from his batting. But you can’t just point out foibles like these. What should have he done? Refuse to play with minnows?

Add to that 21 half-centuries – that makes his conversion rate around 0.53 in ODIs, though less than Kohli’s, is still exemplary.

Amla’s preeminence in the Test arena might beckon people to proclaim him as a better batsman, considering how ODI stats remain inconclusive. But again, the relatively meagre number of matches that Kohli has featured in fails to give weight to this argument.

Asking to choose between these two ODI greats of the modern game is like asking to choose between Warne and Muralitharan as to who was a better test bowler, where records and stats can only tell you so much.

All in all, record books do revere Kohli for now. But the threat of another invader looking to upset the books looms large.