Formula 1 should stop reminiscing about its glorious past, for neglecting the present will have a detrimental effect on its future. Rachit Thukral writes.Ask someone to draw comparisons between Fangio, Clark, Senna, Prost and Schumacher and people would dismiss the question, saying it is not reasonable to compare different eras of Formula 1. However, people tend to forget this very logic, while comparing the current grand prix cars with that of the 80s and the 90s.
Trending
We run out of praise when writing about F1’s illustrious history and how it has evolved into one of the most watched sporting events in the world, while still retaining its DNA. In fact, we review one classic race every other week.The current crop of drivers also relish opportunities to drive classic cars, be it at events such as Goodwood, or sponsor-related promotional events.However, people must realize that there is no point in looking back at the days gone by when a glorious future can instead be carved. Trying to make cars aerodynamically similar to a previous era isn’t a good solution; forward thinking is the right approach.And to be frank, Formula 1 is very much in good shape at present, save for the commercial side. The cars are still some of the fastest in the world and leverage technology that is increasingly finding its presence in road cars, albeit expensive ones.While trackside figures might be falling globally, the Australian and the British Grands Prix have shown that fans are still ready to turn up in hundreds of thousands to watch some of the best drivers race against each other on the same stretch of tarmac.What Formula 1 needs is a competitive pecking order, with multiple teams having a shot at the title. Incorporating aerodynamic changes in the 2017 rules - the outline for which has already been laid – will make it easier to follow cars is one way of improving racing. A more equitable distribution of the prize money will also allow more teams to race at the front of the grid.Various members of the F1 fraternity do a fine job of pulling the sport down, and in context, it is not necessarily totally unjustified, except that they must shoulder the blame themselves. If your website is seeing a sharp decline in visitors, or you are having trouble selling your magazine, you have only yourself to blame. Oh, and please don’t moan about falling TV viewership figures.F1 teams have excellent PR departments which turn drivers into robots when it comes to interviews. But they fail to prevent drivers from criticising the sport. They seem to forget that the higher the audience, more the money flowing from sponsors. Oh, and did we tell these drivers tend to be in teams that are struggling to match Mercedes at present?If people develop a negative perception about the sport, even half-decent races will be considered boring.
Closing thoughts
Comparing different eras is completely unreasonable, especially when F1 is mired in negativity. It’s time to focus on the positives and formulate plans to take the sport to greater heights. Cars are something everyone can relate to, utilise that.Overtaking football and Olympics may seem like a distant reality, but who would have thought F1 would come this far from a passing time for the rich? And what’s the point of expanding to different countries, if the sport doesn’t see an overall surge in its viewership? Lets chase this long term goal together. After all, we all love Formula 1.
Feedback
Edited by Staff Editor
