Has Aston Villa’s starting XI improved?

Nicklas Helenius

Nicklas Helenius of Aston Villa is challenged by Kari Ananson of Rotherham United during the Capital One Cup Second Round match between Aston Villa and Rotherham United at Villa Park on August 28, 2013 in Birmingham, England. (Photo by Neville Williams/Aston Villa FC via Getty Images)

The gangly young Danish striker joined Aston Villa in the knowledge that he would fight for his place and be a bit-part player this season. However, the Dane has shown glimpses of real quality in the appearances he made in pre-season.

As a work-in-progress, Helenius is promising as he is effective in the final third of the pitch, contributes positively to the associative play of the team, has a good first touch, passes the ball cleanly and knows where the back of the net is. Physically, in order to adapt to the demands of the Premier League, Helenius will need a season to adjust.

Paul Lambert has made a shrewd decision by cutting out the middle man. Helenius’s natural development might have seen him move to the Eredivise, play for a few seasons there, score some goals and move to the Premier League for £7m or so in a few years’ time. Lambert has taken a gamble on buying the player now and developing him in the rough and tumble of the Premier League. For the cost of £1.2m, the Villa boss cannot go wrong.

Leandro Bacuna

On signing Bacuna, Lambert praised the Dutch midfielder’s useful versatility. Lambert’s words might not have been of the kind that Bacuna wished to hear, as the player was hoping to become the next Frank Lampard.

Mixed reports have been received from Dutch football fans, from Bacuna being plagued by bad management decisions to him being a pretty average Eredivise player. The truth is probably somewhere in between, but the player is still a young man with a lot of first-team experience in a respectable league.

Paul Lambert has named the Dutch midfielder, “Mr. Fix it”, and Villa fans will be hoping that Bacuna is “Mr. Fix it” rather than “Mr. F%$ it up”.

Bacuna can play in central midfield, right back, and on the wing. Does he excel in any of these positions? No. Is he an improvement on any of the players we have in those positions? No. Is he a good footballer? Not noticeably. I was puzzled with this signing and for the price Lambert paid for the player I would have preferred Villa to sign Crewe’s Luke Murphy. He’s utility cover from the bench at best.

Jed Steer

The signing of Jed Steer was not a priority, but it was not considered to be a gamble as Paul Lambert acquired the player for a bargain price of £250k.

Steer has received many plaudits as a young goal-keeper and Lambert knows the player very well. You would think that there isn’t much that could go wrong with this deal, but Brad Guzan is still the club’s number one and looks likely to remain between the sticks for a few years yet.

Libor Kozak

Libor Kozak’s signing was disappointing for many reasons.

The club had briefed members of the press that Lambert was looking for an attacking midfielder throughout the summer. Fans were teased with the hint that Lambert had signed six players early in the summer as he was hoping to pick up a real quality bargain later on. In fact, right up until the last minute, fans were tantalized by the news that Lambert would add an attacking midfielder to the squad ‘if the numbers were right’.

No attacking midfielder then arrived and Lambert alternatively spent up to a reported £7m on a striker when Villa already had Gabby, Benteke, Weimann, Bowery and Helenius in the ranks. Some clubs only have two strikers, others only have three. Villa now have six strikers!

Following Kozak’s arrival at the club, various articles appeared in Lambert’s defence claiming that Kozak isn’t an out and out striker (he is), and that Kozak would take the pressure off Benteke. Maybe so, but why can’t Helenius and Bowery help with Benteke’s work-load? Teams don’t always have to play with a big striker up front, especially in away games.

If the fee – as some press have reported – was £7 million – (we’re thinking more £5 million), I cannot see the logic in Kozak being Lambert’s most expensive signing so far as Aston Villa manager. Lambert could have acquired a quality midfielder for £7 million and quite frankly, there is no manager in the Premier League who would ever prefer to play Kozak rather than Benteke up front.

After Tony Pulis was sacked last season as Stoke manager, I also cannot think of a manager who opts to play with a 4-4-2 formation either. Villa have a world class centre-forward with four other striking options, did Lambert really need another striker?

It maybe future-proofing for any Benteke departure, but what about the here and now?

Villa desperately lacked creativity last season and Kozak is not the sort of player to create chances for other players. Benteke works fabulously in Lambert’s system as he has a quality first touch, and can keep the ball close to him when Villa counter-attack. Kozak’s first touch is not comparable to Benteke, and I am not sure that Kozak is the sort of player Villa should be investing in for the future.

This signing reminds me of when Martin O’Neil made the mistake of signing Heskey in the January transfer window (or even Taylor signing Tony Cascarino). O’Neill had accumulated an impressive unbeaten run in away games playing Gabby in the false nine position, but he then brought in Heskey in January and Villa were reduced to lumping balls into the box and hoping that Carew or Heskey would get on the end of a cross.

I really hope we don’t go back to that.