#1 Molina has a static philosophy which could turn counter-productive in the knockout stages
With Belencoso missing numerous chances, his time was up in the first half itself. But Molina persisted with the Spaniard, giving him chances. So much so that, Iain Hume was brought on as a second striker, replacing Nato. Nato had a decent game, making significant contributions in the snatcher role and blocking Pune attacks. But Molina subbed him off to the dismay of the Atk faithful and the football punditry.
This stubbornness can harm the team when it is faced with crisis situations. In the knockout stages, there will not be a chance to fall back. As a result, if Molina does not improvise as per the needs, it would be curtains for the team. He should realise the call of the hour and respond accordingly. The static approach is definitely not the correct way in a 3-month long tournament.