Manchester United versus Chelsea promised a lot of fireworks with the numerous sub-plots brewing between the two teams. Moyes started Rooney, much to everyone’s surprise, while Mourinho started without a recognised striker. What was billed as the match of the season, however, ended in a stalemate. While the match was termed as a dull draw by many, it provided a lot of talking points to the tactically keen. Let us have a look at the most important of them all – the battle for the midfield which was won by Manchester United.
The following table clearly indicates who triumphed in the middle of the park. The table is a comparison between the two midfield pairs, Carrick + Cleverley and Ramires + Lampard.
Higher number of passes attempted, higher % pass completion, 9 interceptions compared to none from the Chelsea midfield and 3 key passes – clearly shows that Carrick and Cleverley were miles ahead of their opponents on Monday.
In the past few meetings between the two sides, Chelsea have always held the upper hand more often than not. However, that was not the case yesterday as Manchester United dominated throughout and created good goal scoring chances, but failed to convert any. The dominance shown by United yesterday can be attributed to mainly two facts –
1) Positional exchange between Carrick and Cleverley, i.e., Carrick played as left central midfielder and Cleverley as the right central midfielder. Generally, it is always the other way round, but this tactical master class by Moyes proved to be very decisive.
2) Excellent positional sense of Carrick. While this is undoubtedly Carrick’s main strength, he sometimes goes amiss when he comes up against a strong, fast midfield. However, that wasn’t the case yesterday as he looked the best player on the pitch for Manchester United along with Wayne Rooney.
While this may seem as a minor change in formation, it made a world of difference to the Manchester United side. Previously, when Cleverley played as left central midfielder, right in front of Ramires, he had to track Ramires back often and with Carrick already sitting deep, it gave Lampard and Mata (who often dropped back into central midfield) lots of space to exploit in the centre. Ramires has been very effective against United mainly because of Cleverley’s ineffectiveness to either control him or advance forward into attacking positions.
However, with Cleverley playing as right central midfield yesterday, directly in front of Frank Lampard, he did not have to worry about Ramires’ forward runs. He played higher up the pitch as Lampard himself likes to operate from a deeper position now. And Carrick, who played as left central midfielder, sat deep and his positional brilliance took care of Ramires’ forward runs, if any. With Lampard being crowded out of the game by Cleverley, Ramires had to drop deeper to collect the ball, which allowed Carrick to push up, thereby squeezing Chelsea into their own half.
I would like to illustrate this by using action areas of Ramires, Cleverley and Lampard, both in yesterday’s match and the match played last season at Old Trafford on 5th May, in which Chelsea won 1-0.
It can be clearly seen that Ramires in the match last season was more dominant in the attacking half, while in this season’s match, he was forced to play a much deeper role.
Likewise for Frank Lampard who he pushed forward into United’s half more often in the game last season. However, that didn’t happen on Monday.
Below are Cleverley’s action areas from 3 matches – first one being the match that United won 3-2 at Stamford Bridge on 28th October, the second one is that of the match played on 5th May last season, which Chelsea won 1-0 and the third one being that of the match played on Monday.
Comparing the three, it is evident that his positioning in central midfield was the most in the last match, along with a considerable presence on the right wing too (When Valencia tucked into midfield and took central positions). On the other hand, in the previous two matches, he was pushed back into his own half and on the occasional foray that he made into attack, Ramires made sure that he exploited the space left open by Cleverley.
Carrick excelled in the left central midfield role. With Welbeck coming infield to offer support and Ramires also being pushed back to help Lampard, Carrick had time, space and options to pick a pass.
There was also a huge difference in Cleverley’s and Carrick’s passing statistics. Cleverley’s numbers on passing distribution clearly showed he was all over the place and had almost zero involvement in the final third. Carrick, on the other hand, made several forward passes as well as long range passes. Also, he was fully aware of his position on the pitch and made sure that he did not leave space in the defensive third of the pitch for the likes De Bruyne and Schurrle to exploit
Well, it is clear now that Moyes got it tactically correct in the middle of the park. While some might argue as to whether he should have started Kagawa instead of Welbeck or Valencia, he certainly made the right selection and positioning of his central midfield pair.
On a parting note, here is another stat which shows the United midfield’s increasing influence on their team’s performance.
An impressive 26% of the team’s passes were just between the two United midfielders, which shows almost everything went through them on Monday
It will be interesting to see whether Moyes sticks to this or if he alters his midfield as per the opposition, which should ideally be the case. Also with talk of United buying a central midfielder before the transfer window closes, much surprise and excitement awaits Manchester United fans.
(Stats taken from Sqauwka.com and Whoscored.com)