With the silly season upon us, we will have to gird our loins and steel our nerves against an onslaught of stories, fueled by our own ambition and stoked even further by our FA Cup success and brush with second place. With no less an authority than 'Arry Redknapp attesting to our Prem title ambitions, the usual flurry of folderol has already started flying.
Does anyone outside of the club actually know what they're talking about? Below, I present to you some statistical-ish breakdowns of the major rumour-mongers. Who's making a meal of it, and who's letting actions speak louder than words?
Correct | Reported | Accuracy | |
The Times | 39 | 124 | 31.50% |
The Independent | 21 | 81 | 25.90% |
Daily Telegraph | 37 | 144 | 25.70% |
The Guardian | 19 | 76 | 25% |
Daily Mail | 127 | 563 | 22.60% |
The Sun | 90 | 415 | 21.70% |
Daily Mirror | 181 | 882 | 20.50% |
Daily Start | 59 | 349 | 16.90% |
The Express | 45 | 356 | 12.60% |
El Metro | 31 | 289 | 10.70% |
Using statistics compiled by the website Football Transfer League (FTL), we can get strongersense of just which sources to pay a little attention to. This breakdown doesn't claim to offer 100% accuracy, but it does put into perspective who is peddling clickbait and who is perhaps covering stories that might actually come to fruition. This table shows the number of transfer-rumours linking players to a move to Arsenal since the summer of 2006.
A few disclaimers from FTL (their words, not mine): We do occasionally miss rumours (websites get updated after we check them).
Sometimes, rumours don't have a clear source. In this case, we do not record the rumour. We do not record gossip of transfers 'not happening', e.g. 'so-and-so denies link to football club x.'