What if: Harry Kane had stayed at Arsenal

Modified Apr 30, 2017 06:16 GMT

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 26: Harry Kane of Tottenham Hotspur celebrates during the Premier League match between Crystal Palace and Tottenham Hotspur at Selhurst Park on April 26, 2017 in London, England. (Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images) — One can imagine Wenger would have loved to have Kane

#1 Managerial merry-go-round

LONDON, ENGLAND - AUGUST 31: Brendan Rodgers, manager of Liverpool and Mauricio Pochettino the Spurs manager on the touchline during the Barclays Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool at White Hart Lane on August 31, 2014 in London, England. (Photo by Jamie McDonald/Getty Images) — Pochettino could have moved to United had Kane stayed at the London Colney

With Harry Kane's emergence, Arsenal would think twice before moving for Sanchez in 2014. After all, they would then have bigger concerns in defence and midfield to address, rather than stockpile more attackers into their squad. As a result, Sanchez would move to Liverpool – and Rodgers would successfully keep his job for a few more years with improved results in the league.

Wenger would try to induce Klopp to Emirates. He would most probably succeed as well since all other top clubs have managers in place at that time. With Van Gaal still at Manchester United, Mourinho would move to PSG; it is quite unlikely that he will sit out of football for an extended period waiting for Van Gaal's contract to end.

When Van Gaal's contract expires, United would move for the promising young Spurs manager Pochettino, thus lending a completely different look to the managerial landscape of Premier League football.

Also Read: EPL 2016/17: Tottenham Hotspur vs Arsenal, Combined XI

Edited by Staff Editor