5 Reasons why UFC 209 will be better than WWE Fastlane

We believe that Woodley and Thompson will steal the show again

#3 Over exposure of WWE Superstars

Ad
It seems like we’ve seen the WWE Fastlane matches many times already!
Ad

This is a general problem that WWE faces when compared to UFC. Due to the nature of Raw, which is a 3-hour long weekly program, we feel like we've seen the men and women in question having competed against each other several times prior to this weekend.

We've seen Woodley vs. Thompson too, you counter! Yes, but we've not seen them on a weekly basis. In fact, we've seen two of the Fastlane matches- Bayley vs. Charlotte and Sasha Banks vs. Nia Jax quite recently, at the Royal Rumble pay-per-view.

Get the latest updates on One Championship Rankings at Sportskeeda and more

UFC spaces out fights between its stars to keep the contests fresh. Additionally, WWE has too many pay-per-views happening even if they are brand-specific. The audience member does feel burned out with the sheer content volume.

Quick Links

Edited by Staff Editor
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications