Anatomy of a Fall ending explained: Is Sandra Guilty?

Anatomy of a Fall, the Palme d'Or-winning movie directed by Justine Triet, leaves audiences with a haunting question whether Sandra was guilty of killing her husband or it was truly a tragic accident.

Released on May 22, 2023, Anatomy of a Fall delves into the intricate legal proceedings following Samuel's fall from the family’s rooftop. Sandra’s defense is a mix of legal strategy and personal anguish, complicated by her son Daniel’s conflicting testimony.

In the end, Sandra is acquitted, but the true cause of Samuel’s death remains unclear. The question of whether Samuel's death was the result of a premeditated suicide looms large as the credits roll, leaving viewers to ponder the complexities of the case.

The official synopsis states:

"A woman is suspected of murder after her husband's death; their half-blind son faces a moral dilemma as the main witness."

---

Sandra’s emotional response in Anatomy of a Fall: Guilt or grief?

Anatomy of a Fall centers on a successful writer Sandra Voyter, who experiences hardship following the unexplained death of her husband, Samuel. The vague ending begs more questions than answers and leaves plenty of room for imagination.

After her acquittal, Sandra expresses an unexpected sense of emptiness. She confides in her lawyer Vincent that she feels strange, as though there should be a reward for winning the case. Her reaction suggests unresolved feelings about Samuel’s death, leaving viewers to question whether her guilt extends beyond the courtroom.

If Sandra is innocent, the weight of processing Samuel’s suicide only begins after the trial. If she's guilty, she now faces the challenge of living with the deception. Either way, the emotional toll is evident, as she struggles with the aftermath of a trial that exposed the deepest fissures in her personal life.

---

The uncertain testimony of Daniel

Daniel's testimony, which changes twice over the trial, is among the most arresting features of Anatomy of a Fall.

Daniel first describes hearing his parents casually chatting before his father falls. But he changes his account during the inquiry, saying he was inside the house instead of next to the shed as he had first said.

Daniel’s shifting memory becomes pivotal in the trial. His final testimony hints at Samuel’s possible suicide, as he recalls their dog Snoop consuming aspirin from Samuel’s vomit, which aligns with Sandra’s claim of a suicide attempt.

---

Samuel's Motives: Was it suicide?

Samuel's behavior before his death begs questions throughout Anatomy of a Fall. Evidence against Sandra comes from a videotape he captured of a heated argument.

Sandra, meanwhile, says Samuel might have been trying to challenge her and document their conflict for creative inspiration. If that's the case, Samuel comes out as manipulative, particularly considering suicide.

Although it hurts Sandra, the recording suggests more complex marriage problems and also points to Samuel's mounting contempt of Sandra's achievements.

---

The Ambiguous Evidence: Did it really add up?

The evidence presented in Anatomy of a Fall never fully aligns with either theory of Samuel’s death. The blood splatter and autopsy report suggest he was struck before falling, but it’s improbable that Sandra could have inflicted such an injury given the circumstances.

This uncertainty is reflected in the film’s portrayal of memory and perspective. Daniel's blindness starts to represent the limits of human knowledge, and his evolving testimony supports the notion that truth might be arbitrary. Viewers are left to consider the same uncertainty the characters in the movie experience.

---

Production and direction

Directed by Justine Triet, Anatomy of a Fall is a carefully constructed legal drama that explores themes of truth, memory and marital discord. Triet’s direction brings out nuanced performances from the cast, particularly Sandra Hüller, who portrays Sandra Voyter with a blend of vulnerability and strength.

Triet’s decision to leave the ending ambiguous allows the audience to become active participants in the story, interpreting the evidence and deciding for themselves whether Sandra is guilty or innocent.

---

Insights on Marriage and Memory

Beyond the legal drama, Anatomy of a Fall delves into the complexities of marriage and the subjectivity of memory.

Tension exists in Sandra and Samuel's relationship, and the trial magnifies their past disputes. Even within the parameters of marriage, the film begs significant issues about how much we really know about another person.

---

Anatomy of a Fall leaves audiences wondering more than it answers. For Sandra or the viewers, her acquittal doesn't bring closure. The actual cause of Samuel's death is still unknown, and the uncertainty about the matter emphasizes how poorly the legal system can be in finding the complete truth.