"You waive a lot of rights" - Netizens speculate MrBeast is "trying to nip class action lawsuit problem" through Lunchly's terms of service

Netizens speculate MrBeast is "trying to nip class action lawsuit problem"
Netizens speculate MrBeast is "trying to nip class action lawsuit problem" (Image via @LoganPaul/X)

A new chapter has unfolded in the ongoing controversy surrounding Jimmy "MrBeast," Logan Paul, and Olajide "KSI's" new business venture, Lunchly. On September 18, 2024, snippets from the brand's terms of service surfaced on social media, with tech reporter Jeff Geerling (@geerlingguy on X) stating that anyone who purchases a product from Lunchly's official website appears to "waive a lot of rights."

While speculating that MrBeast is attempting to "nip the class action lawsuit problem," the Geerling wrote:

"Looks like @MrBeast is trying to nip the class action lawsuit problem in the bud with @Lunchly; if you buy any products from their website you waive a _lot_ of rights (apparently). Note: Lunchables requires no waiver."

Jeff Geerling posted a screenshot of "Section 21" of Lunchly's official terms of service and policies, which states:

"Section 21 - Class action waiver. You agree that any claim you may have against Lunchly shall be brought individually through arbitration conducted pursuant to Section 20, and you shall not join any action with claims of any person or entity or bring, join, or participate in a class action suit against Lunchly."
Section 21 of Lunchly's terms of service and policies (Image via lunchly.com)
Section 21 of Lunchly's terms of service and policies (Image via lunchly.com)

The social media post has garnered significant traction on Reddit, with over 100 community members chiming in. Some of the most pertinent reactions were along these lines:

"It's Disney all over again," said Redditor Raiho216.
"I don't think you can waive the rights to suing a company for their products just because you buy their products. That just sounds insane in a 1st world society. Can someone more knowledgable on this topic confirm? I'm sure federal law overides this clause in any practical case?" commented Redditor kekekeke_kai.
"I can see it now. 'Man killed during MrBeast Production, family denied recompense because he bought a Lunchly,'" remarked Redditor Jafades.

Has MrBeast responded to the backlash surrounding Lunchly?

On September 18, 2024, MrBeast responded to X user @DramaAlert's tweet, when the latter posted that "YouTubers are not happy" with his, Logan Paul, and KSI's venture. While comparing Lunchly to Lunchables, the 26-year-old stated that the company's goal was to offer a "better alternative" to the latter.

He then claimed that Lunchly has fewer calories and sugar, uses "real" ingredients, and provides "more electrolytes." Furthermore, MrBeast wrote that providing a "higher quality version" of Lunchables "at the same price" is a "net good."

Quick Links

Edited by Abhishek Manikandan
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications