#1 Worst: The clean sweep
![Does RAW winning 6-0 make SmackDown Live the B show?](https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=190 190w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=720 720w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=640 640w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=1045 1045w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=1200 1200w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=1460 1460w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg?w=1600 1600w, https://statico.sportskeeda.com/editor/2018/11/08d26-15426066057879-800.jpg 1920w)
Listen, I understand that RAW's 6-0 clean sweep over SmackDown Live is leading to some major storyline development down the line. I am intrigued to find out how it actually plays out. I'm just a little disappointed that SmackDown Live was squashed in this embarrassing manner. Why would we be invested in another edition of brand warfare next year?
Had RAW won 4-2 or even 5-1, it would have added some amount of interest in SmackDown Live, down the line. In fact, the one person to have suffered a loss could have been punished on RAW as well. It would have been a rather interesting storyline development.
A female WWE star said her life is in danger. Details HERE
Whatever the case may be, I hope that the payoff to the storyline is worth it. WWE needs to justify why RAW destroyed SmackDown Live so easily.
Or they may lose viewers on both brands down the line...