#6 Tatanka
When you’re looking to make someone into a WWE Legend, i.e. someone that can promote the company to the public, it would make sense to use someone who could act as a great success story based on their own accomplishments in that company.
Tatanka was not one of those people.
Tatanka’s WWE career wasn’t one worthy of being called a WWE Legend. He spent the majority in undercard and mid-card matches and rarely got any major title shots. His career during the mid-1990s wasn’t particularly impressive, and his return a decade later didn’t yield any major results, either.
Ultimately, the decision to make Tatanka into a WWE Legend should be treated with scepticism. His WWE career was bereft of any exceptional moments, so why is he being honoured with a title befitting someone with a legendary career?