#2 Kane vs Randy Orton
Kane has had a stellar career. Debuting at the top of the card in a feud with the Undertaker, he has rarely left the main event and has been a massive part of the WWE's success over the past two decades. The company's faith in his abilities is evident even today, with his destruction of main event talents such as Seth Rollins and Finn Balor.
In much the same vein, Randy Orton will sit comfortably aside Kane in the Hall of Fame one day. Since his run in Evolution and becoming the youngest world champion in WWE history at Summerslam in 2004, he has fought and beaten absolutely everyone. From new talent to old, Orton has RKO'ed his way through them all.
Then why, with two such historic talents such as Kane and Orton, would a match between them leave such a bad taste in the mouth? It's a matter of chemistry and history (and perhaps a few other sciences too). Kane and Orton are safe, and at times, plodding in-ring performers who work well with dynamic opponents who can change the pace of a match, through either their skill or courage. They've also fought plenty of times before and never added to anything more than something that was observable by the human eye.