3 Reasons why Brock Lesnar vs The Rock should main event Wrestlemania 35 and Rumble reasons it should not

Image result for Brock vs the rock summerslam 2002

#2 SHOULD NOT: We are due for a Women's main event and now is the best time

There's no better time to have a women's match main event a Wrestlemania.
There's no better time to have a women's match main event a Wrestlemania.

Before Becky Lynch was forced to choose Charlotte Flair as her replacement at Survivor Series, a showdown between Flair and Ronda Rousey was the rumored main event for next April

Since they had to call an audible and have Flair face Rousey this weekend instead of in April, it shifts the potential Wrestlemania card around again. Even with the shifts, WWE can still have a female match as the main event.

Becky will certainly be cleared by next April, so they could either have her vs. Rousey, Flair vs. Rousey or a triple threat involving all three. Let's face it - the Rousey/Lynch feud was turning into one of the best in years due to Lynch's fantastic work since she won the title.

If they want to rekindle that fire, they could do so again in the lead up to Wrestlemania.

It will be one of the most highly-anticipated feuds in the lead up to the show and will allow WWE to build up other 'mania programs while the main focus is on 'the Man' and 'the Baddest Woman on the Planet'.

You know Becky is still burning to face Rousey. She has unfinished business. And Flair is sure to deliver either way if involved.

If we are to truly take the 'Women's Evolution' seriously, then the best way to do so is to let them main event the biggest show of the year. It's not like they'll fail to deliver.

Quick Links

Edited by Nishant Jayaram
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications