34 things that should happen at WrestleMania 34 - PART 1

#5 The first ever Wrestlemania Women’s Battle Royal is star-studded

The formulae for success here is: Past vs Present vs Future

Ever since WWE announced that the first-ever WrestleMania Women’s Battle Royal will be taking place at "the showcase of the immortals" this year, many were excited to finally see all the women on the company's roster get a chance to shine.

While some were excited, many were outraged with the name being attached to this special bout, and ever since WWE has now moved away from that controversy, the question is, how does the company book this match?

Battle’s Royal's at Wrestlemania mean one thing, expendable wrestlers being thrown over the top rope until a winner is decided, and while that is the case most of the time, WWE has an opportunity to make the first ever Wrestlemania Women's' Battle Royal mean more than a pre-show filler.

Therefore, the only way to make this bout prestigious is to make it star-studded, and while most would think that star-studded means veterans wrestlers added to this match to give it some importance, it would actually mean having the three generations of women wrestlers in the company colliding.

To be more accurate it would be the past vs the present vs the future. The WrestleMania card has some of the most valuable women wrestles going into the event without no narrative. Therefore, that will allow confrontations such as Trish Stratus, Mickie James and Beth Phoenix vs Becky Lynch, Sasha Banks and Bayley vs Nikki cross, Ember Moon and Shayna Baszler. WWE has an opportunity to create something special with this match and shouldn't pass up this concept.