#2 Fifty men is just too much
Remember the last time the WWE tried something similar with the Royal Rumble?
Yea, it was the 40-man Royal Rumble event in 2011. A memorable event, was it? Yeah, that's what I thought. Not at all.
Corey Graves deleted his Tweet! More details HERE.
Why? Because even 10 extra men in the Rumble event resulted in too much happening at times or just too little in terms of meaningful storyline development inside the match.
So just imagine what a train wreck it's going to be with 20.
Yes, the surprise entrances will always elicit a 'pop' from the fans and there are bound to be a few cool spots from the likes of Kofi Kingston and possibly a few brutal eliminations courtesy of Braun Strowman.
But does it all actually mean anything?
The winner of the Royal Rumble event that takes place in January goes on to face either the WWE or the Universal Champion at WrestleMania.
What will the winner of the Greatest Royal Rumble get to do?