'%20x='0'%20y='0'%20height='100%25'%20width='100%25'%20%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20xlink%3Ahref=''%3E%3C/image%3E%3C/svg%3E)
#3: Sheamus and King Corbin somehow got involved in a "heel vs. heel" feud against each other
Trending
Well, it can't be denied that WWE has suddenly made some very unorthodox or unusual decisions. However, many of those unexpected decisions have been quite unnecessary in some way or another.
Nia Jax beating up a WWE official on this week's RAW, even after she had been suspended, was an example of the aforementioned situation.
Did you know a top WWE Superstar just wrestled outside the company? More details HERE
On last night's WWE SmackDown, however, viewers were subjected to a "heel vs. heel" feud for some reason.
As Sheamus faced Matt Riddle in the opening bout, Shorty G came out and interfered, which automatically gave Riddle a disqualification victory.
Sheamus didn't like that King Corbin's "ransom" cost him a victory against Riddle last night, and before you know it, Sheamus cost Corbin a match against Jeff Hardy later in the episode.
Despite all Jeff Hardy has been through, it looks like Sheamus attacking him at this stage was just a mere payback against King Corbin.
On one hand, it's an intriguing mystery why WWE chose to break their own trope by pitting two of the most despicable heels against each other. However, does Sheamus vs. King Corbin sound like a must-see feud to you at this point in time?
