#1. Giving the TLC stipulation to Baron Corbin vs Roman Reigns
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08074/08074eb8dc427e94f9bd3206f5ce201faec4e9cb" alt="A temporary stable?"
This was a decision we didn't understand at all and after the match, we're yet to get our answer. Why was the TLC stipulation given to the Roman Reigns-Baron Corbin match? It was a grudge rivalry and deserved a stipulation - but not a TLC match.
To begin with, WWE already had a worthy TLC match - The Kabuki Warriors vs Becky Lynch & Charlotte Flair. That was the right choice for the stipulation as well as the main event. It felt as though the TLC stipulation was wasted on the Reigns-Corbin match as ladders were hardly utilized and there wasn't a title hanging above the ring.
Is this man the funniest man in wrestling?
It did serve the purpose of fueling the brawl that would be seen twice in the show later on and we anticipate that Reigns will align with The New Day, and Shorty Gable (possibly Mustafa Ali as well) to counter the temporary stable of King Corbin, Dolph Ziggler, The Revival, and perhaps Robert Roode when he returns next month.