5 mistakes WWE shouldn't make at Hell in a Cell

#2 Not having blood on the show at all

Hell in a Cell without blood and gore, is pointless

The whole point of a Hell in A Cell match is watching two people beat themselves silly, to the point of no return. So blood can make or break a match, really. And if Vince McMahon were to say that blood is banned in the new era, it would be a lie because Brock Lesnar vs Randy Orton had an entire pool of blood in the ring.

We think that the Seth Rollins vs Kevin Owens match, in particular, should feature blood, to make it look realistic. And wipe away the whole comedic prelude to the match in question. Both are amazing workers, and if given freedom, they will definitely make it work in an encounter for the ages.