5 Reasons Brock Lesnar winning WWE Money In The Bank is a huge mistake

Did WWE just make a colossal mistake?
Did WWE just make a colossal mistake?

#4 Part-time Money In The Bank holder

Lesnar is the first part-time MITB holder
Lesnar is the first part-time MITB holder

As I mentioned briefly during the intro, what's the point of having a Money In The Bank briefcase holder who is a part-timer? All the suspense from the MITB holder being backstage and being able to cash in at any moment is out of the window. We all know that Brock Lesnar's WWE appearances are rare so the only way the MITB briefcase can be at the forefront is through Paul Heyman.

However, Heyman cannot cash in the briefcase so the aforementioned suspense will not be there even if the MITB briefcase is.

Also, how many promos on Brock Lesnar being the Money In The Bank contract holder can Paul Heyman cut before the fans get tired of it. This comes after a certain section of fans, including myself, are already bored of Heyman being used as just Lesnar's mouthpiece.

Quick Links

Edited by Arvind Sriram
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications