5 reasons Goldberg winning the Rumble would be bad for business

Bubemi
The man, and everyone else, are better off without him winning the Royal Rumble

#4 It devalues the rest of the roster

Ad
Goldberg and Kevin Owens in the ring on Monday Night Raw
Goldberg wrestled in the AJPW before WCW
Ad

The fact that a 50-year old man who hasn't wrestled in 12 years, can walk into the biggest wrestling company in the world and beat the most protected wrestler on the roster is an absolute disgrace.

On top of that, him winning the rumble would be an even bigger slap in the face of all the legitimately talented workers in the company.

Think of the names that have tried to beat Lesnar clean over the past two years: John Cena, Seth Rollins, The Undertaker, Randy Orton and Roman Reigns have all failed, but Goldberg succeeded in record time, how?

Ad

The one beast that tore through EVERYONE, was beaten by a 50-year old in two minutes. What was the point of the previous two years of booking? I genuinely cannot see what Bill brings that the current roster doesn't.

He's not a draw, he's not a star attraction, he's just a washed-up wrestler that was incredibly pushed back in the day. If he can waltz in and do what several others can't, it makes the rest of the roster look worthless.

People complain that the WWE doesn't create enough new stars but then are happy when ex-stars come in and devalue the current ones. Talk about being counter-productive.

Major rumor about recently released stars HERE

Quick Links

Edited by Staff Editor
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications