5 reasons why Jason Jordan would have been a better choice for Survivor Series than Triple H

Modified Nov 30, 2017 12:59 GMT

Enter c — Jason Jordan was removed from the Survivor Series team on the go-home RAW to Survivor Series

#2 - It would have avoided a flat finish

Enter capti — Braun Strowman's expression tells the whole story

The fact of the matter is, the Survivor Series main event finish was really bad. It was terrible seeing a 47-year old Shane McMahon be the last man standing on Team SmackDown while Triple H hogged all the glory. The only good thing that came out of it was Strowman getting to destroy Triple H and send the crowd home happy.

If Jordan were there in the match, this kind of a finish wouldn't be possible in any way. Triple H ended the match in the most...Triple H way possible.

This led to a sour taste in the mouths of many fans, criticising the finish for being flat and completely underwhelming for a match of that calibre.

Even if Jordan were eliminated early, it would have prevented such a flat finish.

About the author

Rohit Nath is a content writer from Bangalore, India. A former full-time employee of Sportskeeda, Rohit was a part of building Sportskeeda's WWE section in its rapid growth. His work has been featured in both Sportskeeda and Wrestlezone.

Some of the big names interviewed by Rohit are AJ Styles, Jinder Mahal, Jimmy Uso and Sasha Banks. Some of his popular weekly features include RAW Preview, "X things Subtly told us" and "Wrestling rumors we hope are true and those we hope aren't".

Know More

Becky Lynch has been challenged HERE.

Edited by Pratyay Ghosh