5 Reasons why Triple H should take over WWE and not Shane McMahon

Triple H, Stephanie McMahon and Vince McMahon
Triple H, Stephanie McMahon and Vince McMahon

#4 Triple H knows how to make the best use of the talent under him and his primary focus is on full-time performers

Ad
Ad

Vince McMahon relies on part-time superstars a lot more than NXT does Brock Lesnar, for instance, doesn't work a full schedule. Yet he's one of the highest paid Superstars on the roster. Yes he is beneficial to the company, but the fans’ opinion matters as well. A significant part of the WWE Universe doesn't want Brock Lesnar to hold a World Championship for a long time because he doesn't defend it regularly.

Ad

ALSO READ: Former Superstar finally reveals her reason for leaving WWE last month

John Cena's last PPV's name revealed by Kurt Angle? More details HERE

Triple H, on the other hand, is well-known among the WWE universe for putting over young talents whenever he gets the opportunity to do so. He always thinks about the future of WWE and knows that active performers are going to benefit the company in the long run. Since Triple H has already proved this from many times and it’s why we think he should replace Vince McMahon, instead of Shane McMahon.

Quick Links

Edited by Pratyay Ghosh
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications