5 Reasons why WWE should only have one set of men's Tag Team titles

#3 Every team on the roster won't necessarily get a run with the titles

Ryder and Hawkins won the titles at WrestleMania 35

On RAW, three of the current five teams have been tag Champs. On SmackDown, due to greater depth, five of the ten teams that have at least competed together this year have held tag team gold. If the titles are so prestigious, then why has half of each division already had runs as Champions?

The New Day and The Usos have become synonymous with the tag team division for the last seven years. It makes sense that they are consistently in the title picture. But just throwing a title reign the way of the B-Team or giving one to Ryder and Hawkins isn't necessary. Every title is special and if most of the teams/Superstars on the roster have had a run as Champion then it takes away the luster of being the best.

The same thing happened briefly after the brand split in 2016. The SmackDown Women's division consisted of Becky Lynch, Naomi, Carmella, Natalya, Alexa Bliss and Eva Marie. Of all of those women, only Eva Marie failed to capture a title. If everyone on the show has been a Champion, then what really sets them apart? It's does give the commentators the right to call the women a "former Champion" but the accomplishment is lessened if more than half of the division can claim that. Titles are important and should not be given to anyone and everyone.