5 ways WWE shouldn't turn Roman Reigns babyface

Roman Reigns and Paul Heyman
Roman Reigns and Paul Heyman

#3. Seth Rollins attacking Roman Reigns

Seth Rollins and Roman Reigns having a tense confrontation on SmackDown
Seth Rollins and Roman Reigns having a tense confrontation on SmackDown

Seth Rollins has quietly been the #2 heel on SmackDown, well behind Roman Reigns. Their paths haven't crossed much since, minus a brief confrontation where Cesaro was the central figure.

There might come a time when WWE wants to establish Seth Rollins as SmackDown's top heel in favor of Roman Reigns becoming a babyface, and this might be the catalyst for it all.

Check out which wrestler EC3 finds cute RIGHT HERE

It would require careful planning, but ultimately, it isn't the best option to go with if WWE wants to turn Roman Reigns' babyface. It's something that has already been done before in 2014, and recycling it for the biggest face turn of the decade won't be a good idea.

It's better if Seth Rollins has an organic rise to the top as a heel again, while Roman Reigns has an organic babyface turn. They don't need to cross paths in the process, but it would be a bonus if done right. Hopefully, WWE doesn't recycle the Shield breakup storyline.

Quick Links

Edited by Daniel Wood
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications