7 baffling booking decisions from WrestleMania 34

#1 Why did a child win a championship?

This is worse than David Arquette. And yes - I'm serious.

I have never been so frustrated, so dumbfounded by the foolishness of a booking decision, that I turned off a pay-per-view,until last night. A 10-year-old child is a champion in WWE. Read that again and try to justify it.

First of all, this is a sinful misuse of Braun Strowman, who is easily RAW's hottest commodity right now. Second, it's a burial of the entire tag team division.

It was bad enough that Strowman demolished the entire division on his own, but even worse that he beat the Tag team champions in four minutes with a literal child as his partner.

Putting this into perspective - WWE decided that a child was a more suitable Tag Team Champion than, say, The Revival, or the "Woken" Hardys, or even Titus-freaking-Worldwide.

Any justification of this decision is null. Sure, WWE "does a lot for the kids, but that doesn't mean they should give them one of their ACTUAL CHAMPIONSHIPS. Sure, maybe they're doing this to build Braun Strowman up as the new hero, but why do so at the expense of so many talents who work so hard week after week?

This is no better than having a part-time, 50-year-old Goldberg win RAW's top championship from Kevin Owens in 22 seconds.

This is no better than WWE's relentless push of Roman Reigns over fan favorites like Daniel Bryan, The Undertaker, and even Braun Strowman himself. This is no better than David-sodding-Arquette winning the WCW Championship.

This blows. This flat-out, full-stop, inexcusably blows.