#6 Returned Rollins to television too fast
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b722/5b72269ac591986fc675e7410a5b467b5ec1c092" alt="Let's be honest here. WWE should have kept Seth Rollins off of television for a while after the attack."
What In the world was WWE thinking?
Not only did it take away from the impact of the initial heel turn when WWE decided to bring Seth Rollins back the very next week to confront Ambrose, but it also took away an opportunity for the company to let things cool off and bring him back for a surprise return. Furthermore, the move completely took away from the viciousness of the beatdown, which is disappointing.
Think about it! If WWE would have gone ahead and just taken Rollins off television for a while, it would have given the company time to fool around with Ambrose as a heel for a little bit and would have also made the eventual confrontation between Ambrose and Rollins a lot more meaningful
In fact, WWE could have even kept Rollins out of action until The Royal Rumble and brought him back as a surprise entrant to keep Ambrose from winning. At least that way WWE could pace the storyline a lot better, allow Rollins to claim that Ambrose tried to ruin his career and give Rollins the payback he needs to keep the feud going.
Major rumor about recently released stars HERE