#3 Involving the tag team titles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07b9a/07b9aec7b0371e07207276478fb47ea8da1e1a8d" alt="Is WWE making the right decision by keeping the tag team titles on Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose?"
WWE has been known to jump the gun and come up with some pretty bad decisions in the past, but none of them seems to compare to what they have recently done with The Raw tag team titles. In fact, one has to wonder exactly is going to happen to the tag team titles now that Ambrose and Rollins are officially feuding.
While Ambrose and Rollins winning the tag team titles from Dolph Ziggler and Drew McIntyre was a great tribute to Roman Reigns, it all became for nothing when Ambrose turned on Rollins moments later. The problem now is that WWE either has to vacate the tag team titles, which is something they have already done this year, or force Ambrose and Rollins to defend them.
With that in mind and the already damaged nature of The tag team division as of late, either way, WWE goes about this is going to have serious drawbacks. For example, WWE can vacate the titles again, but that would only hurt their value and probably set up yet another tag team tournament that no one wants to see.
On the other, WWE can force Ambrose and Rollins to defend the titles, which will most likely result in Ambrose betraying Rollins again, costing them the match and losing the tag team tiles without even trying. Unfortunately for whoever wins the tag team titles from them, it takes away from the legitimacy of the win and hurts that teams subsequent run with the belt.
Another problem with this second idea is that Ambrose has already betrayed Rollins, which means that there would be nothing gained from him doing it again in a tag team match. In the end, holding the tag team titles is only going to hurt this field until Ambrose and Rollins lose them, which makes one wonder why WWE would even bother to have them, win it in the first place.