Pros and cons of Brock Lesnar's Universal Championship reign

Enter capt
The start of a controversial reign.

Con #3: The Universal Title loses its chance to gain credibility as a World Title

E
The least prestigious world title.

How cursed is the Universal Title. The first ever champion was injured before his reign started, the second champion had a fairly lackluster reign, being overshadowed by a piece of paper, the third was a coming-out-of-retirement dad in his 50's, who was basically a transitional champion, and finally, the current champion.

Even before it is established properly as a world title, the Universal Championship is on a hiatus courtesy Mr. Mayor of Suplex City.

A top AEW star just called one of his colleagues 'spoiled' and 'narcissistic' HERE.

The Universal Champion fighting for UFC is just not the same as the WWE Champion fighting for UFC.

Just imagine if Brock showed up with the historical WWE Championship at the UFC. It would have been a killer storyline of Brock holding up the most prestigious title hostage. But since it is just the 2-year-old Universal Championship, it is not as big of a deal.

youtube-cover

What are your thoughts on Lesnar's title reign? Let us know in the comments below!

Quick Links

Edited by Kishan Prasad
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications