5 reasons why WWE should not end the brand split after the title unification match

Brock Lesnar vs. Roman Reigns could spell the end of the brand split.
Brock Lesnar vs. Roman Reigns could spell the end of the brand split.

#2. Survivor Series will become less interesting

youtube-cover

One of the brand split’s biggest positives was that it brought about Interbrand warfare. RAW and SmackDown clashed at Survivor Series every year to determine which brand was superior that year, with multiple dream matches taking place.

Before the two-brand setup, however, Survivor Series was just another generic pay-per-view. It became a must-see because WWE embraced a dual-brand venture, and it's in danger of becoming mediocre again if they end the split.

While WWE can still make Survivor Series a decent event, it won't carry the hype of two brands duking it out for bragging rights.


#1. Interest in the product will dip

If we're to talk numbers, WWE made more money during the brand split era as more fans tuned in to watch both their shows and the pay-per-views, whereas the pre-split time saw most viewers on RAW and SmackDown’s viewership sub-par.

Numbers don’t lie, and if WWE wants the money to keep rolling, they'd be wise to persist with the brand split. There's an appeal in having one champion reigning over two brands, but it wouldn’t be the smartest thing to do.

Quick Links

Edited by Abhinav Singh
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications