#1. Seth Rollins retained via no-contest?
Seth Rollins vs Bray Wyatt was the most anticipated match at Hell in a Cell this year, as The Fiend has become a popular star over the past few months. Wyatt was stepping into just his second match with his new persona and, even though WWE fans wanted him to become Universal Champion, it was obvious that WWE had other plans.
Instead of ending the match clean, WWE decided to have the referee stop the match and deem it a no-contest since Wyatt was unable to move during Rollins attacks. If the referee feared for Wyatt's safety like he stated that he did, then surely the match should have been stopped when Rollins hit Wyatt in the face with a chair.
Will John Cena beat Ric Flair's record? A former WCW Champion thinks so HERE
This is the second no-contest finish to a Hell in a Cell match in two years, the crowd was left unhappy and even X-Pac, who was watching the match on "WWE Watch Along", wasn't happy with the result. WWE should have just allowed Rollins to win the match clean, or allowed interference from some of the legends, at least that would have made more sense.
What about you folks? Agree or disagree with any of these? Think of any other mistakes they made? Share your ideas in the comments section.
Follow Sportskeeda Wrestling and Sportskeeda MMA on Twitter for all the latest news. Do not miss out!